France 1954 -> Homeclick!
Cette page en françaisCliquez!

The 1954 French flap:

The index page for the 1954 French flap section of this site is here.

OCTOBER 4, 1954, PONCEY-SUR-L'IGNON, COTE D'OR:

Reference number for this case: 4-oct-54-Poncey. Thank you for including this reference number in any correspondence with me regarding this case.

REPORTS:

[Ref. vm1:] "VAR-MATIN REPUBLIQUE" NEWSPAPER:

After the cigars and the saucers...

The flying soup tureen makes its appearance

Limoges, October 7. -- A farmer of Chalaix (the Dordogne), Mr. Gareau, claimed on his honor, to have seen a "flying soup tureen" come to land on his property. Mr. Gareau stated that two perfectly normal men covered of khaki suits came out of it, shook hands with him and spoke a language unknown to him. Mr. Gareau, amazed, did not answer. The two men caressed his dog and went up in their apparatus that flew away without noise at a vertiginous pace. At the place indicated by Mr. Gareau, it was noted that the grass had been pressed.

A red sphere

A mason, residing on the Island of Ré, Mr. Simonetti, has stated to have seen a luminous sphere of approximately 12 meters in diameter, which scintillated at about fifty meters from the ground.

The sphere, he said, became red, turned blue and rose vertically very quickly.

Two inhabitants of the Island of Ré stated to have been witnesses of the same phenomenon. Two Parisian on holiday in the community of Mouchamp, Mr. and Mrs. Laroche, claimed to have seen, at the fall of night, an incandescent sphere.

Blinded by a beam of light

Mrs. Thérèse Fourneret, 23 years old, living in Poncey-sur-Lignon (the Côte d'Or) saw Monday evening, a machine come to land in the meadow not far from her residence. She stated that, frightened, she had taken refuge at neighbors'. The gendarmerie noted very clear traces on the ground at the indicated place. Turfs had been torn off and projected in a radius of 4 meters.

Mr. Landrin, employee with the Waters in Duclair (the Seine Inférieure) who was wandering in company of his wife, was blinded by a beam of light. When he reopened the eyes, he said, he saw a ball which disappeared a few minutes later.

Finally, saucers, flying cigars, crowns and all other objects were seen in St Etienne, in several villages of the Eure et Loir, in Heyrieux (the Isère), Dieulanvallon (the Côtes du Nord), Ajot (the Calvados) and in Biarritz.

[Ref. qh1:] "LE QUOTIDIEN DE LA HAUTE-LOIRE" NEWSPAPER:

RAIN OF FLYING SAUCERS IN FRANCE

Testimonies on the flying saucers seem to become increasingly precise. Various people in the same area announce the same phenomenon and one can say that one has assisted for a few days to a true rain of flying saucers, cigars or discs on the entire France. A farmer of Chaleix (Dordogne) Mr. Garreau affirmed on his honor to have seen a flying soup tureen land in his property. Mr. Garreau declared that two perfectly normal men covered of kaki suit descended, shook hands with him and spoke a language unknown to him. Amazed, Mr. Garreau did not answer, the two men caressed his dog and went up in their apparatus which flew away without noise at a vertiginous pace. A luminous sphere 12 meters in diameter was seen in the Island of Ré by a mason, Mr. Simonetin. The sphere, he said, became red after having hovered within 50 meters of the ground, it changed to blue and rose very quickly vertically. The craft was also observed by two Parisian on holiday. Mrs. Thérèse Fourmeret, 23 years, inhabitant of Poncey-sur-l'Ignon (Côte d'Or) saw Monday evening a craft land in a meadow not far from her residence. She declared that frightened, she had taken great care not to observe this phenomenon longer and had taken refuge at neighbors'. The gendarmerie noted very clear traces on the ground at the indicated place. Turfs had been torn off and projected in a radius of four meters.

In Duclair (Seine-Inférieure) Mr. Laudrin, employee of the water supplies who was walking with his wife, was dazzled by a ray of light, when he reopened the eyes, he saw a ball that disappeared a few minutes later.

A roadmender of Mertrud (Haute-Marne), Mr. André Narcy, claims to have approached within less than one hundred meters a flying saucer posed in a field close to Voillecomte. He saw near the machine a small being, high of approximately 1,20 meters who was dressed of a kind of cape covered with hairs. Mr. Narcy challenged the strange character who did not answer him and threw himself in his machine which flew away vertically. According to Mr. Narcy, the machine was of spherical shape, of a diameter of ten meters approximately. Under the sphere was a kind of spindle and the porthole by which the being returned in the machine was just between the spindle and the body of the apparatus. At the start of the latter, a kind of flame came out of the spindle while a large vaporous movement occurred under the machine. On the spot he noted that the dew did not exist any more on some surface. The grass had a slightly milky color and was crushed on a square of approximately three meters side. Moreover, twelve parallel traces resembling prints of round feet were distributed at a certain distance, letting think that the apparatus had landed with a succession of small sudden starts...

[Ref. cg1:] OURANOS, CHARLES GARREAU:

French ufologist Charles Garreau wrote in 1955:

Scan


INVESTIGATION REPORTS

Poncey-sur-L'Ignon (C. d'Or. - France) - October 4, 1954 - Landing.

Investigator: Mr. Charles GARREAU, Member of the Studies Committee, Regional Correspondant C.I.E.O.

It was approximately 8 o'clock in the evening. For one hour the night had fallen. An inhabitant of PONCEY-sur-l'Ignon, Mrs. FOURNERET, a young woman aged 23, was on the point of closing the shutters of her bedroom.

She lives together with her husband in a house contiguous to the asbestos factory of Poncey, where her husband works. The factory extends between two wooded slopes from the hills, at a few hundreds of meters of the village.

On Monday evening, Mrs. Fourneret was alone. She was on the point of getting her young child to sleep, and opened the window.

What she saw nailed her on the spot. At some twenty meters, a luminous body was gently wobbling in the air with height of the plum tree, as if it prepared for landing.

Its dimensions? "Approximately three meters in diameter ", specifies Mrs. Fourneret for me.

That is all that she can provide as precisions. Hardly does she remember that the object was of yellow orange color, slightly illuminating the foliage of the nearby plum tree.

During one hour, Mrs. Fourneret and Mrs. Bouiller remain locked at home.

At this point in time two neighbors arrive, Misters Girardot and Vincent. Informed, they are get their rifles and move towards the meadow.

There is nothing left, neither machine nor "Martian" on the prowl. But, within less than three meters of the tree's trunk, a very fresh print attests that Mrs. Fourneret did not dream.

Forming a trapezoid, with rather irregular sides, of 1 m 50 approximately of length, 0 m 50 at its small base and 0 m 70 at its large base, a whole surface of pre like was like pickled, exposing the ground. On the very fresh abrasion, white worms are still agitated, cut in two.

The grass fell down in mounds, in a radius of 3 to 4 meters following to a vaguely ovoid contour, which roughly speaking follows the shape of the tear.

On its edges, the ground is "excavated" under the grass. It seems that this part of the meadow was sucked up with an extraordinary violence, at the moment of the departure of the machine, and that the raised mounds are repercussions in sheaf, like the drops of a water fountain. An odd detail: a plant with deep roots has remained, alone in the center of the naked ground.

No traces of burns. No prints in the neighborhoods.

And yet the machine remained at least half an hour in the same place. Indeed, returning from his work, François Bouiller, a 18 year old young man, saw it when it gained altitude, directing to the south.

"I was terribly frightened, young François tells me. I saw this machine which slipped by in the night, taking a greenish yellow color as it moved away. One would have said a plane's fuselage without wings."

François returned at his place, making a frightened face. What he saw comes to confirm the declarations of Mrs. Fourneret.

Other people of the area also saw the cigar when it went away.

Alerted, the gendarmes of the brigade of Saint-Seine came to carry out an investigation under the direction of captain Millet, in command of the squad of Semur.

Photographs were made and samples were taken.

I for myself carried out sampling of the ground, which I subjected to various scientific organizations of Dijon and Paris. Negative results with the Geiger counter.

The investigation lead by the gendarmerie of Dijon and the police force of the air could not establish with certainty the nature of what had landed. But it concluded to the reality of a landing after having drawn aside any possibility of a staged hoax or mystification.

The very next day, in Paris, I met Mr. Decker, chief engineer, director of the service of the special Machines of the Air Force. I told him of the strange story. Very disturbed, and without being able to decide, he also rejected any idea of trickery, admitting as "highly probable" the landing of an unknown machine.

Charles GARREAU

[Ref. am1:] AIME MICHEL:

French ufologist Aimé Michel gave a detailed and lively account of this case. Here is its substance.

On October 4, 1954, at about 08:00 P.M., Mrs. Fourneret of Poncey-Sur-l'Ignon is inside her residence. The night has fallen, so she goes towards a window to close the shutters, she then sees a luminous object hovering with gentle oscillations in the air at about twenty meters of the house, on the right of the plum tree on the field of a neighbor, Mr. Cazet. She stated that the luminous object seemed to get ready to land.

She described the luminous object as being approximately three meters in diameter and with an elongated shape, horizontal, and of orange color, with a luminosity which slightly lit the branches and the leaves of the plum tree.

Frantic with terror, she takes her little child and takes refuge with him at a neighbor's, Mrs. Bouiller, and the two women carefully close the door. At this time, two neighbors, Mr. Girardot and Mr. Vincent show up, note the state of panic of the two women and ask what happened. When being told, they get their rifles and run towards the field, where the object is nowhere to be seen anymore.

However, looking at the ground, they discover a very fresh trace, which convinced them that Mrs. Fourneret did not dream. The two men check the trace. Aimé Michel will give following description of it:

"On a surface of 1,50 meters long, 70 centimeters broad at its base and 50 at its end, the ground seemed to have been sucked up. On the very fresh abrasion, white worms were still agitated. The torn off ground was widespread all around the hole in mounds of 30 centimeters in diameter on a radius of 4 meters approximately. On the internal edge of the hole, mounds hung towards the inside: the ground had been eroded underneath, so that at half of its average depth, the surface of the hole was larger than on the level of the ground. But, more astonishing, no trace of instrument explained the extraction of this mass of ground. Even better (and it is that especially which could never be explained): the small roots and rootlets of this fertile Burgundian soil were intact on all of the internal surface of the hole; none was cut, as if it would have been the case if one had dug the excavation with any known means. A detail struck everyone: in the medium of the hole, a plant with deep root was laid down, attached to the ground at its bottom by the end of its root, rootlets in the air, without any damages. In short, all happened as if the ground mass spread in the grass around the hole had been sucked by a gigantic vacuum cleaner. Same characteristics on the mounds scattered around in the grass: neither cut roots, nor traces of instrument, no burns, no prints. Many people tried to reproduce the phenomenon since. With no success."

October 4, 1954, towards 20:00, Mr. Fourneret and some potato gatherers were gathered together at Mr. Cazet's, the Mayor of Poncey-Sur-l'Ignon, when a villager came on a bicycle, breathless, and called Mr. Fourneret, shouting to him to come quickly, as Yvette, Mr. Fourneret's wife, "saw something in the field" in front of Mr. Fourneret's house, had been frightened and took refuge in the residence of Mr. Bouiller, near Mr. Fourneret's house.

The entire group goes to Mr. Fourneret in some minutes and finds Mrs. Yvette Fourneret, her young son, Mr. and Mrs. Bouiller, and two other neighbors, Mr. Girardot and Mt. Vincent. Everyone hears Mrs. Fourneret's story, and gathered around the hole.

At this time, François Bouiller, aged 18, shows up, returning from work, and before anyone can tell him about the reasons of the gathering, he explains with great excitation that he just had the fright of his life, for he had just seen a sort of luminous craft which flew at high speed towards South-east while gaining altitude. He describes the craft as similar to a plane without wings, reduced to its only fuselage, which took an increasingly greenish color as it accelerated.

On October 5, 1954, at about 07:00 P.M., the Mayor of Poncey-Sur-l'Ignon, Mr. Anatole Cazet, phoned the Gendarmerie station at Saint-Seine the Abbey and tells them that a flying saucer had landed in a field the day before and that several people saw it. He adds that the machine left unexplainable traces. The Sergeant is skeptic enough but indicates that he will come to the premises for an investigation.

Meanwhile, many inhabitants went on the spot of the landing and contemplated the trace. All were very excited by the event.

The Gendarmes who carried out the investigation collect the testimony of several other people in the area who stated to have seen a luminous object which had risen near Poncey and had slipped by in the direction of the South-east, shortly after 08:00 p.m. on October 4.

On-field investigations were carried out by Charles Garreau, by the Sergeant of the Gendarmerie of Saint-Seine-l'Abbaye, who initially thought that he was going to find a simple hoax there, changed opinion in consequence of the investigation, and contacted his superior Captain Millet of Sémur-in-Auxois. Captain Millet went to the site, with the firm idea that his subordinate had been fooled by pranksters, but after having interrogated the inhabitants and having examined the trace, he changed opinion and contacted his own superior, Commandant Viala of Dijon. Viala organized a follow-up investigation by the services of the Aeronautics of Dijon, by the Air Force, and an unnamed professor of the University of Dijon who tried to check if the ground were radioactive and determined that it was not. Photographs and soil samples of the trace were taken. Metallic objects of the neighborhoods were checked against magnetic remanence traces but nothing could be found. The case also interested General De Chassey, c.o. of the Dijon Air Force Base. The entire case circulated up to the highest official authorities within only two days. The totality of the people having taken part in the investigation, gendarmes, military, scientists, ufologists all were convinced that the case was absolutely not a hoax.

Aimé Michel carried out checks against the ground samples at the Institute for Radium, in Paris, he could not detect any radioactivity. He regretted later than at that time nobody had thought of performing what decades later became a common practice in these cases: the search for alterations in the roots of the plants and in the plants.

Michel deeply thought about Lieutenant Plantier's theory. Plantier, of the French Air Force, had a few years before written a speculative study on the problem of the propulsion of the flying saucers and emitted an idea which was quite new and daring for those times: flying saucers may be propelled by creating their own flexible gravity field. Michel thought that the fast departure of the craft would have quite simply involved an upwards fall of the ground under the machine, which seems to be the only judicious assumption to adapt the so particular characteristics of the trace, where all looked indeed to be as if gravity had been reversed in this place, the ground initially "falling" towards the sky, leaving the roots intact, then falling down to ground on the sides of the hole once the machine and its gravitational effect left.

[Ref. jv1:] JACQUES VALLEE:

4 Octobre 1954, 20h00. Poncey-Sur-l'Ignon (France)

Mrs. Fourneret, housewife, flee at the sight of a circular orange object 3 meters in diameters, balancing itself in the air and which landed close to her farm. When Mr. Girardot and Mr. Vincent arrived with their rifles, they found that the ground "had been sucked up" on the surface of a quadrilateral. Mr. François Bouillier confirmed to have seen a luminous object in flight. An investigation was carried out by the Gendarmerie and the French Air Force.

(Franc-Tireur, l'Aurore, Libération, 7 Oct,; France-Soir, Paris-Presse, 8 oct. 1954. Anatomy 71)

[Ref. jv2:] JACQUES VALLEE:

The author indicates that on October 4, 1954, in Poncey-sur-Lignon, a housewife fled when an orange, circular object of approximately 3 meters in diameter was oscillating in the airs and landed close to her farm. When her neighbors arrived, armed with rifles, they observed that the ground "had been sucked" on a square surface, so that the idea of a joke had to be abandoned. Extensive research and analyses were made by the police force and the French Air Force. The nature of the object, just as the traces it had left, remained unexplained.

[Ref. 522] CLAUDE POHER, UFO RESEARCH GROUP "GEPA":

In 1968-1969, before the official GEPAN ufology effort started, its future head Dr Claude Poher was a member of the unofficial GEPA ufology group, and gathered a computer coded listing of more than 700 UFO reports on which multiple factors statistical computation could be run. In the file were a number of 1954 French UFO reports, among those this one.

For readability, a decoded interpretation of the data is provided here under the original 80 character encoded string. Decoding was done according to the original indications, the code number and its generic meaning is given. Please not that the generic meaning of each code is a predefined category, not the real specific details of the case. For example, if the main witness' age was 33, the coding would result in a number "3" which corresponds to a category "Adult from 21 to 59 years."

Original code:0621550410195419301JA213301023101401000430B0019000100000000000000000000800000010
Location:Poncey sur l'Ignon (Cote dor) - France
Case number:0621
Source code:55
Nature of the source:Reports from official French sources : Police, Gendarmerie, Army, Pilots
Day:04
Month:10
Year:1954
Hours:19
Minutes:30
Type of Time:1 = local time
Number of witnesses:2 = 2
Main witness named:1 = name(s) indicated
Main witness age:3 = Adult from 21 to 59 years
Main witness occupation:3 = workman, truck driver, employee, craftsman, nurse, musician, writer, businessman
Official investigation:1 = an official investigation was made
Weather:0 = no indication
Duration:2 = from 1 to 9 seconds
Minimal distance witness - phenomenon:3 = from 21 to 150 m
Method of observation:1 = naked eye
Number of "objects" observed simultaneously:01 = 1
Shape of the "object" (terminology of witness(es)):4 = oval, egg, ovoid, "like a rugby ball"
Dimensions of the phenomenon:0100 = 1 meter
Color of the observed phenomenon:04 = yellow, amber
Luminosity of the phenomenon:3 = shining, very luminous
Lights or projectors on the phenomenon:0 = no indication
Moving speed of the phenomenon:B = Speed is compared with an airplane speed
Acceleration of the phenomenon:0 = no indication
Trajectory of the phenomenon:0 = no indication
Sounds perceived during observation:1 = no noise, total silence, object noiseless
Maximum angular height of observation (horizon = 0°):9 = "seen on ground" or "close to the ground"
Nature of the landing place:0 = no indication
Number of contact points with ground:0 = no indication
Traces of landing:1 = traces observed
Observation of "occupants":0 = no indication
Height of the occupants observed:00 = no indication
Garment of the occupants:00 = no indication
Garment:0 = no indication
General behavior of "occupants":0 = no indication
Interaction of "occupants" with witness:0 = no indication
Head, hair:0 = no indication
Voice, breathing, chin:0 = no indication
Skin:0 = no indication
Eyes:0 = no indication
Mouth:0 = no indication
Various details:0 = no indication
Thermal effects:0 = no indication
Luminous effects:0 = no indication
Magnetic effect (or electromagnetic):0 = no indication
Odor perceived by witness:0 = no indication
Physiological effects on the witness(es):0 = no indication
Psychological effect on the witness(es):0 = no indication
Effects on animals:0 = no indication
Other effects reported:8 = violent mechanical action
Nebulosity:0 = no indication
Oscillations, emission of matter:0 = no indication
Spin, formation flight:0 = no indication
Immediate disappearance:0 = no indication
Halo surrounding the phenomenon:0 = no indication
Interaction witness / phenomenon (complement to the other rubrics):0 = no indication
Drawing or photo:1 = a drawing or a photograph is added to the original report
Structural details observed:0 = no indication

[Ref. gl1:] CHARLES GARREAU AND RAYMOND LAVIER:

The authors describe the case of the landing in Poncey-sur-l'Ignon on October 4, 1954, noting that the gendarmerie investigated it lengthily.

In Poncey-sur-l'Ignon in the department of Côte-d'Or,at 8 p.m., Mrs. Yvette Fourneret, in her thirties, in her apartment of the old asbestos factory located at a few hundreds of meters of the village, close to the National Road RN71 from Dijon to Troyes. She opened the window of her kitchen to close the shutters, whereas the night had completely fallen and the outside was very dark. This window, located on the back of the building, faced the countryside, i.e. a very narrow valley boxed between two hills with rather stiff slopes.

Mrs. Fourneret indicated the day after the sighting Charles Garreau who came to interview her, that she had thrown a casual glance at the meadows behind the house, and that she then saw a luminous object which gently swinging, on the right of a plum tree, as if it prepared to land.

She stated declared that the tree, which was some 20 meters from her window, was slightly lit by an orange gleam coming from the object. The object had an oval form, horizontally lengthened, with a length that seemed to her to be of approximately 3 meters. She became panicked and closed the window, then took her baby on the arm and fled by the front door to the house of a neighbor, Mrs. Bouiller, and the two women barricaded themselves while waiting for the return of their husbands.

But it was first two other neighbors who arrived, Girardot and Vincent. They noted the panic of the two women and decided to go to see the object, taking their rifles. They run to the meadow but there is nothing anymore.

While looking near the plum tree, they discovered that on a surface of 1,50 m long, broad at its base of 70 centimeters, and at its end of 50 centimeters, the ground was like sucked up. Grass mounds were torn off and thrown around, turned upside down, in a circle of ten meters in diameter. The ground was removed by below, with the result that the bottom of the hole was broader than on the ground level.

Charles Garreau examined this trace 24 hours later, and it made him think of an enormous suction which would have torn off the grass, except however for a wild plant that remained rooted as if it resisted, alone in the middle of the pickled surface. He noted that the lumps of earth were like if they had rained around the hole.

Charles Garreau took one of the mounds and brought it to Aimé Michel, who had it analyzed and checked by various laboratories, but nothing was not found by these examinations. He notes however that neither him nor Aimé Michel had heard about the US Air Force's ATIC discovery on another trace case (that of Sonny Devergers), in which the roots of the grass had been superficially carbonized without showing damages on the leaves.

Another witness was a 18 year old boy, François Bouiller, who was unaware of all the fuss when he arrived at the old factory where a certain number of the village's residents were gathered and discussed the event. The young man was pale and announced immediately:

"I have just had one of these jitters. I saw a kind of luminous craft rising in the direction of the South-east. You would have said a fuselage of an plane, without wings, and it accelerated very quickly. Its color gradually changed to green."

Charles Garreau notes that Commander Viala and Captain Millet, of the gendarmerie, the air police force, the intelligence service of the Chief of Staff of the 1st Air Area came to investigate in turn into this landing, and that it revealed another sighting two days before, that of a luminous craft in the shape of an "oil barrel" which had flown over the village while following a trajectory parallel with the road from Dijon to Troyes.

Charles Garreau went back on the premises 1971 with Raymond Lavier, they met Mrs. Fourneret again, she had not forgotten a thing of the event and provided another interesting information, saying:

"During four years, the grass did not grow back at this place."

[Ref. fr1] MICHEL FIGUET AND JEAN-LOUIS RUCHON:

The two authors indicate that in Poncey-sur-l'Ignon in the department of the Côte-d'Or on October 4, 1954, at 07:30 p.m., whereas she was in her bedroom, a first witness was closing her shutters, when she saw at approximately fifty of meters of her residence and above the trees, a luminous thing having the size of a cooker which was swinging gently in the air, on the right of a plum tree.

This object lights the branches and the leaves of the tree. Frightened, she flees, with her child in the arms, to a neighbor's, while passing by the back of her residence not to be in contact with the luminous phenomenon.

She cannot explain what she had just seen only five minutes later to her neighbor and a friend of the latter. One hour later, the neighbor's child and the husband of the friend arrive, they warn another neighbor and then proceed to the place, armed with their shotguns, and in company of the first.

In the meadow next to the courtyard, they discover traces.

Another member of the neighbor's family who was regaining his residence towards 08:45 p.m. saw in the sky an unknown object in the shape of large cigar, sort of like a fuselage of a plane but shorter and without wing, entirely luminous, the color which one would have said to be transparent had green and orange reflections. It could have been at a thousand meters of altitude, it moved north to the south, a double the speed of a jet airplane. Frightened, he went back to his residence, where he found the members of his family who had already noted the traces left by the luminous ball. The latter were within a few meters of the plum tree whose foliage had been lit by the ball, it had a surface of 1 m 50 broad at its base of 70 cm and its end of 50 cm, the grass had been like sucked. Grass sods of 0 m 20 by 0 m 30 were widespread and were turned over around on a radius of 4 meters. On the very fresh hole, white worms were still agitated.

The commander of section of the Gendarmerie came on the location. An investigation was carried out and was the subject of the official report Nr. 391 of the brigade of Saint-Seine-l'Abbaye. Samples were taken. A lump of earth was presented to a Geiger counter of the university of Dijon. Result: nothing, no radioactivity.

A mound was examined by Aimé Michel with instruments of the Institute of the Radium with the same lack of success, and this small piece of ground would eventually be thrown away.

[Ref. cc1:] GILBERT CORNU AND HENRI CHALOUPEK:

The authors indicate that on October 4, 1954, a "quasi-landing" "seems" to have been "certain" in Poncey-on-Lignon in the Côte-d'Or, having rather numerous witnesses and important traces on the ground.

Initially, Mrs Fourneret, when closing her shutters towards 07:30 p.m., saw an oval luminous object of yellowish color which was gently swinging about fifteen meters above the ground near a close plum tree. Thrown into a panic, she fled to neighbors' with her child in the arms, taking great care to pass "behind" the house to avoid being in contact with this worrying light.

Other witnesses saw a luminous phenomenon in the sky, but more remote. One hour later, when the men returned, they went on the spot with neighbors, armed with rifles, and discovered near the plum tree a surface of 1.50 meters out of 0.70 meters where the grass had been torn off recently since "the white worms are still agitated there."

These plates of this grass from 20 to 30 centimeters side and "turned over" were scattered around at a distance of several meters as if they had been torn off the ground by aspiration.

The authors indicate as sources "A propos des S.V." by Aimé Michel, page 167; Ch. Garreau and R. Lavier in "Face au E.T." page 39.

[Ref. bp1:] JOURNAL "LE BIEN PUBLIC:"

In an article of October 22, 2000 headlined "The first UFO seen in Poncey-Sur-l'Ignon 46 years ago. Can it be believed?", this regional daily newspaper of Dijon summarized the events:

"Two days later, in the same small village, on Monday, October 4, at 19h30, Mrs. Fourneret, while she was going to close the shutters, saw, at 50 m, as posed at the top of a plum tree in the nearby field, a disc flattened at both ends which emitted a soft orange light. Frightened, Mrs. Fourneret took her baby and fleed at a neighbor's where they locked themselves up during an hour while waiting for their husbands. Armed with rifles and equipped with flashlights, the latter checked the location. They would discover a rectangular surface of 1,50m X 0,60m in the field, regularly weeded and the ground as rammed. On a ten meters circumference, in circle, lumps of earth were torn off then scattered. Oddly, the perennials plants such as the dandelions and the grass remained rooted. Two other inhabitants, who had not seen the machine, noted that the ground had been sucked up. During 4 years nothing grew in this place. Did the previous craft return and land, (which would explain the vacuum cleaning of the rectangular surface)? No one will never know! In this October 1954, other observations were made in the area: on 10 in Epoisse, on 11 in Lacanche, on the 14 in Meursanges, on the 16 in Saulieu."

IMAGES:

From right to left: Mrs Fourneret showing peculiarities of the trace to reporter and ufologist Charles Garreau and ufologist Jimmy Guieu as they investigated the case and interviewed witnessed on location.

NOTES:

Poncey-Sur-l'Ignon is a small village of the department of Côte-d'Or, in the area of Burgundy, and had approximately 140 inhabitants at the time of the events.

In 1959, Charles A. Maney, in the continuation of a discussion on UFOs carried through in Akron (Ohio), U.S.A., and using the maps raised by Aimé Michel, evoked the following possibility:

"The map n.º 7, established by Aimé Michel, which holds thirty points of observations for the 2nd of October 1954, shows a infinity of lines, with nine ortothenical lines that cross on Poncey, a little village in the northeast of the center of France. And, one more time, as Aimé Michel noticed, a great "luminous cigar" was observed in the intersection, at Poncey, on the evening of October 2. An organized program of exploration by extraterrestrial intelligence seems to be a reasonable interpretation of such an extraordinary geometric circumstance."

EXPLANATIONS:

Not looked for yet.

KEYWORDS:

(These keywords are only to help queries and are not implying anything.)

Poncey, Poncey-Sur-l'Ignon, Côte-d'Or, Fourneret, Anatole Cazet, Bouiller, Girardot, François Bouiller, orange, luminous, hovering, landing, trace, traces, police, Gendarmes, Army, analysis, roots

REFERENCES:

[---] indicates sources that I have not been able to check yet.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict



 Feedback  |  Top  |  Back  |  Forward  |  Map  |  List |  Home
This page was last updated on September 25, 2007